Left Continue shopping
Your Order

You have no items in your cart

You might like
Free Shipping Order Over $150

Green Pepe (Mycena chlorophos)

Mycena chlorophos Species Guide

Mycena chlorophos

Mycena chlorophos is a bioluminescent bonnet mushroom native to the subtropical and tropical forests of Japan, Southeast Asia, India, Australia, and beyond, where its caps and gills emit. It is the most scientifically documented bioluminescent mushroom in the world, with a published genome sequence, a patent-documented fruiting protocol, and decades of Japanese cultivation research behind it. For mycologists who want to grow a mushroom that genuinely glows, this is the species with the deepest evidence base.

Mycena chlorophos (Berk. & M.A.Curtis) Sacc. — Family Mycenaceae — Order Agaricales — MycoBank MB 147895

Species Mycena chlorophos
Common Name Green Pepe; yakoh-take
Family / Order Mycenaceae / Agaricales
Trophic Mode Saprotrophic (wood decay)
Native Range Pantropical: Japan, SE Asia, Australia, Americas
Edibility Unknown — not for consumption

Mycena chlorophos is the world's most-studied bioluminescent mushroom — the species with a published high-quality genome sequence, a peer-reviewed fruiting protocol, biochemically characterized luciferase enzymes, and documented ecotourism significance across Japan, India, and Australia. First collected from the Bonin Islands of Japan in 1854 and formally described in 1860, its name is a direct Greek translation of what it does: chloros (green) + phos (light).

Interested in this species? Out-Grow carries a liquid culture.

Mycena chlorophos Liquid Culture

What Is Mycena chlorophos?

Mycena chlorophos is a small, delicate agaric belonging to the family Mycenaceae — the bonnet mushrooms — a genus of mostly wood-inhabiting species found across every forested continent. What distinguishes it from the vast majority of its relatives is a sustained, oxygen-dependent biochemical reaction that converts caffeic acid from decaying wood into visible green light without any heat output. The glow is not a flash or a pulse: it is continuous, lasting approximately 72 hours per fruiting body at 21°C, and bright enough to read by in a fully darkened room, according to Japanese museum displays.

The informal common name "Green Pepe" originated in the Bonin Islands (Ogasawara) of Japan, where local residents historically called the mushroom by this name. The name also appears in Melanesian and Pacific Island usage, where pepe in some dialects refers to small mushrooms or, in folklore, to ghost lights and forest spirits. It is a genuine regional name with documented use — not a fabricated or invented common name — though it carries no formal taxonomic sanction and is not universally recognized across the species' pantropical range. The Japanese common name yakoh-take (夜光茸, "night-light mushroom") is older, more historically grounded, and used in peer-reviewed Japanese mycology literature.

As a saprotrophic (wood-decaying) fungus, Mycena chlorophos obtains nutrition by breaking down the lignin and cellulose of fallen woody debris. It does not require a living tree partner, which is the critical biological fact for cultivators: unlike mycorrhizal fungi, which are currently impossible to fruit in captivity, this species can in principle be grown on sterilized dead wood-based substrate. And unlike many other bioluminescent species where fruiting remains speculative, M. chlorophos has been brought to fruiting body production repeatedly, in both peer-reviewed laboratory settings and Japanese public museum displays.

The Most Scientifically Documented Bioluminescent Mushroom Among approximately 100 known bioluminescent fungal species, Mycena chlorophos stands apart: it is one of only five bioluminescent Mycena species with a sequenced whole genome (Ke et al., PNAS 2020); its key luciferase enzyme (McH3H) has been biochemically characterized; its fruiting conditions are documented in both a peer-reviewed paper (Mori et al. 2011, Luminescence) and a Japanese patent (JP2002065057A); and it drives ecotourism on Hachijo Island, where night-time forest tours to witness its glow are described as one of the most economically significant tourism activities on the island.

How Is Mycena chlorophos Classified?

The complete taxonomic classification of Mycena chlorophos runs as follows:

Rank Name
Kingdom Fungi
Phylum Basidiomycota
Class Agaricomycetes
Order Agaricales
Family Mycenaceae
Genus Mycena
Section Exornatae
Species Mycena chlorophos (Berk. & M.A.Curtis) Sacc.

The species was originally described by British mycologists Miles Berkeley and Moses Ashley Curtis in 1860 as Agaricus chlorophos, based on a specimen collected from the Bonin Islands in October 1854 during the U.S. North Pacific Exploring and Surveying Expedition (1853–1856). In the same paper, Berkeley and Curtis described a second collection — Agaricus cyanophos — from nearby. Japanese mycologists Ito and Imai later concluded in the 1930s that both collections represented the same species, and this synonymy was confirmed by Desjardin and colleagues in 2010 through analysis of type material and recently collected specimens. Pier Andrea Saccardo transferred the species to genus Mycena in 1887, establishing the current combination. The MycoBank and Index Fungorum ID is MB/IF 147895; NCBI Taxonomy ID is 658473.

Within the genus, M. chlorophos sits in section Exornatae, characterized by an ixotrichoderm pileipellis (a gelatinous cap skin layer — see Morphology below), amyloid basidiospores, and distinctive cheilocystidia. Other luminescent section members include M. discobasis and M. margarita.

The M. illuminans Separation — Important for Identification Some older literature treated Mycena illuminans Henn. as a synonym of M. chlorophos due to morphological similarity. This was definitively resolved by Chew et al. (2013, Mycologia) using nuclear large subunit (LSU) ribosomal DNA sequences: M. illuminans is a distinct species. Critically, ITS barcoding alone may not reliably separate the two in regions — particularly Malaysia and Southeast Asia — where both species co-occur. LSU data is required for confident identification in these areas.

How Do You Identify Mycena chlorophos?

Mycena chlorophos is relatively well-described by mycological standards, with the most authoritative account provided by Desjardin et al. in their 2010 redescription published in Persoonia, based on type material and fresh topotypical collections from the Bonin Islands. A 2021 Kerala, India collection (Arya et al., Studies in Fungi) adds microscopic data from the Indian population.

Macroscopic Features

Cap Diameter
3–30 mm
Most commonly 10–25 mm at maturity
Cap Shape
Parabolic → convex → umbilicate
Shallow central depression develops at maturity
Cap Surface
Viscid — thick gelatinous layer
Key field character; disappears when dry — diagnostic pitfall
Cap Color
Dark blonde to off-white
Young: dark grayish-brown; mature: fading to near-white with brownish disc
Gills
17–32 full-length, close
Adnexed; white; up to 4 mm wide; micaceous (shiny) edges — primary luminescent structure
Stipe
5–30 mm × 0.3–1 mm
Hollow; cupulate (cup-shaped) basal disc 1–2.5 mm wide — key ID character; non-viscid
Bioluminescence
Caps & gills: bright; stipe: little/none
Peak luminescence 25–39 hours after primordium initiation; fades ~72 hours at 21°C
Spore Print
White to off-white
Standard for genus
Critical Field Pitfall — The Viscid Cap The thick, glutinous (slimy) cap surface is one of the most reliable macroscopic characters for M. chlorophos in field conditions. However, this character disappears entirely when specimens dry out — the gelatinous layer desiccates, causing the cap to warp and crack. Observing dry specimens may lead to misidentification. The cupulate (disc-shaped) stipe base is a more stable character that persists across hydration conditions.

Microscopic Features

Feature Dimensions & Description
Basidiospores 6–10 × 4–6.8 µm (mean 7.72 × 5.66 µm); Q = 1.06–1.69; ellipsoid, smooth, amyloid (react with Melzer's reagent), thin-walled, hyaline
Basidia (standard) 26–36 × 6–8 µm; 4-sterigmate, clavate, thin-walled; sterigmata up to 13 µm
Basidia (short form) 16.8–22 × 12–16 µm; subglobose to vesiculose-clavate; abundant — atypical and diagnostically notable
Cheilocystidia 28–68 × 5.6–20 µm; fusoid-ventricose to broadly lageniform; long whip-like apical extension — a key diagnostic character
Pleurocystidia Absent
Pileipellis Ixotrichoderm (gelatinous matrix) up to 145 µm thick; hyphae 2.4–3.2 µm diam., highly branched, coralloid; terminal cells densely spinulose
Clamp connections Present in all tissues

Lookalikes and How to Tell Them Apart

Molecular ID Required

Mycena illuminans

Nearly identical macroscopy and overlapping spore dimensions; co-occurs in Malaysia and SE Asia. ITS barcoding is unreliable for separating these two — LSU sequence data is required. Any new Pacific/SE Asian collection labeled M. chlorophos should include LSU confirmation where possible.

Same Section

Mycena discobasis

Also luminescent, also in section Exornatae. Distinguished by paler caps, larger spores (mean ~9.9 × 6.7 µm vs. 7.72 × 5.66 µm), and cheilocystidia that lack the whip-like apical appendage characteristic of M. chlorophos.

Same Section

Mycena margarita

Luminescent; smaller spores (mean ~6.9 × 4.4 µm); smaller cheilocystidia; distinctive loop-like clamp connections; strong chlorine odor. The odor character alone is a reliable field separator when present.

Regional Lookalike (India)

Mycena deeptha

A recently described Indian species; smaller fruiting bodies (1–9.5 mm cap); plicato-sulcate (prominently pleated) pileus; smaller spores (7.6 × 3.8 µm); vesiculose cheilocystidia; non-viscid cap surface. The non-viscid cap distinguishes it from M. chlorophos in the field.

Where Does Mycena chlorophos Grow?

Mycena chlorophos is classified as pantropical — meaning it is distributed across tropical and subtropical regions on multiple continents. Desjardin's 2010 redescription formally documented its pantropical range; subsequent records from India (2019–2024), Australia, Costa Rica, and Brazil have extended the documented distribution. The species grows on fallen twigs, branches, bark, and decaying wood in humid forest settings, with substrate preferences varying by region.

Region Substrates Documented Season
Japan (Bonin & Hachijo Islands) Decaying petioles of Phoenix roebelenii palm; general woody debris June–July and September–October; day after rainfall
India (Kerala) Dead and decaying culms of Ochlandra tavancorica bamboo May–October (monsoon)
India (Maharashtra / Goa) Rotten bamboo substrata Monsoon season
SE Queensland, Australia Associated with Araucaria cunninghamii (Hoop pine) and Macaranga spp. Summer wet season
Malaysia / Borneo / Indonesia / Taiwan Decaying wood in moist tropical lowland forest Year-round in humid zones
Brazil / Costa Rica Tropical forest woody debris Wet season

Fruiting in Japan has been closely documented: on Hachijo Island, mushrooms emerge reliably after rainfall during the two rainy seasons (June–July and September–October), with relative humidity around 88%, and fruit bodies typically appear the day after rain. The species is acutely moisture-sensitive: primordia that become too wet are deformed, while insufficient humidity causes the gelatinous cap membrane to break and the cap to warp and crack.

A question remains about whether parts of the range — particularly South America — reflect natural pantropical distribution or human-assisted long-distance spore dispersal. This was examined by a SUNY-ESF molecular study comparing Taiwanese and museum voucher specimens, but remains unresolved. Its conservation status formally lists the species as endangered in three Japanese prefectures (Fukushima, Chiba, and Miyazaki) under Japan's national Red Data system, driven by subtropical forest habitat loss.

Can You Cultivate Mycena chlorophos?

Mycena chlorophos can be cultivated to fruiting body production under controlled conditions — this has been peer-reviewed, patent-documented, and demonstrated at scale for Japanese museum displays. The critical enabling discovery, published in Japanese Patent JP2002065057A, was that continuous fluorescent light exposure throughout the spawn run and fruiting phases is required. Prior attempts using humidity and temperature alone had failed to reliably produce fruiting bodies. Light is not optional; it is mechanistically required.

Patent-Documented Fruiting Protocol — JP2002065057A (Japan, 2000)

Substrate: ≥50% peat moss; remainder may be leaf mulch and/or rice bran (20% by weight). Moisture adjusted to 70%. 200g per translucent polycarbonate culture bottle — transparency is a functional specification, not an aesthetic preference.

Sterilization: 100°C for 1 hour, then 120°C for 1 hour in a direct-fired pressure cooker.

Spawn run: Inoculate with M. chlorophos culture. Incubate at 26–28°C, 60% RH, under continuous fluorescent light. This is the key innovation — light during spawn run.

Fruiting initiation: Once colonized, apply casing soil (fine dampened leaf mulch, 5g per bottle). Continue fluorescent light. Raise humidity to 90–100% RH; reduce temperature to 22–24°C.

Timeline: Primordia appear approximately day 8 post-casing; fruiting bodies ready approximately day 10 after primordia (~18 days post-casing). Full cycle from inoculation to harvest: approximately 6–7 weeks.

Subsequent flushes: Scrape mycelium surface, re-case at 10–14 day intervals. 1st flush ~10 fruiting bodies per bottle; 2nd ~8; 3rd ~7 (vs. 2–3 per bottle by older methods without light).

Temperature and Luminescence Optima

Mycelium Growth Optimum
27°C
Peer-reviewed (Mori et al. 2011, Luminescence)
Primordium Formation
21°C optimal
Temperature drop from spawn run required to trigger fruiting phase
Maximum Luminescence
27°C
Brightest glow occurs at vegetative growth temperature — thermally uncoupled from fruiting optimum
Luminescence Peak Timing
25–39 hours post-initiation
When cap fully expanded; intensity declines thereafter
Luminescence Duration
~72 hours at 21°C
Undetectable to naked eye after approximately 3 days per fruiting body
Fruiting Humidity
90–100% RH
Patent-documented; lower humidity causes cap cracking and deformity

Cultivation Steps

1

Prepare and Sterilize Substrate

Peat moss (≥50%) mixed with leaf mulch or rice bran to 70% moisture. Pack into translucent containers — light-permeable walls are functionally required. Sterilize at 121°C for 60+ minutes.

2

Inoculate and Run Spawn Under Light

Inoculate with liquid culture. Incubate at 26–28°C at 60% RH under continuous fluorescent light. This light exposure during spawn run is the critical difference from failed earlier methods.

3

Case and Initiate Fruiting

Once fully colonized, apply 5g fine dampened leaf mulch as casing soil. Raise humidity to 90–100% RH. Drop temperature to 22–24°C. Maintain fluorescent light. Primordia appear around day 8.

4

Harvest and Observe

Fruiting bodies ready approximately 10 days after primordia appear. Peak luminescence occurs 25–39 hours after primordium initiation. View in complete darkness with dark-adapted eyes (20+ minutes dark adaptation recommended).

5

Subsequent Flushes

Scrape surface mycelium and re-apply casing at 10–14 day intervals. Multiple flushes are achievable. Luminescence fades ~72 hours per fruiting body — harvest timing affects display quality.

What Out-Grow's Liquid Culture Contains

Each 12cc syringe contains living Mycena chlorophos mycelium in a sterile nutrient solution, ready for inoculation onto agar plates, sterilized substrate, or terrarium media. The liquid culture is the starting point: it delivers viable dikaryotic mycelium that bypasses the slow and contamination-prone spore germination stage.

For terrarium display work — colonized decaying wood or bamboo sections glowing in a humid enclosure — the liquid culture can be used to inoculate sterilized hardwood twigs or bamboo directly. For fruiting body production, the patent-documented protocol above provides the most reliable published pathway: peat-based substrate, translucent containers, continuous light, and the temperature drop at fruiting initiation.

Contamination management is critical: Mycena species are slow colonizers, giving fast-growing competitors (particularly Trichoderma and Penicillium) extended opportunity. A laminar flow hood and strict sterile technique are strongly recommended. Community growers note that grain supplementation substantially increases fungus gnat and mold risk; starting with peat-dominant substrate as in the patent is advisable.

What Bioactive Compounds Does Mycena chlorophos Contain?

The bioluminescence biochemistry of Mycena chlorophos is the single most-studied aspect of this species and among the best-characterized bioluminescent systems in any terrestrial organism. Beyond the bioluminescence pathway, no published studies on polysaccharides, terpenoids, alkaloids, antimicrobials, or antioxidants specific to this species have been identified. Any such claims on general wellness pages should be regarded as unverified extrapolation from other fungi.

The Bioluminescence Pathway

Hispidin (Precursor)

Peer-Reviewed

A styrylpyrone compound synthesized from caffeic acid and malonyl-CoA by the enzyme HispS (hispidin synthase). Measured at 25–1,000 pmol/g fresh weight in M. chlorophos fruiting body gills. The starting material for the entire light-producing chain.

McH3H (Key Enzyme)

Peer-Reviewed

Hispidin-3-hydroxylase from M. chlorophos — the enzyme that converts hispidin to 3-hydroxyhispidin. Biochemically characterized by Linde et al. (2020): NADPH-dependent, FAD-containing monooxygenase. Substrate binding boosts flavin reduction rate ~100-fold. In vitro reconstitution (McH3H + NADPH + hispidin + luciferase) produces visible green light.

Luciferase (McLuz)

Peer-Reviewed

The light-emitting enzyme; oxygen-dependent. Expression logFC 4.7 in bioluminescent vs. non-bioluminescent mycelium (adjusted P<0.001). Quantum yield in gills: 0.017; in stipe: 0.00096 — quantitatively explaining why gills glow ~18× brighter than stipes. Partially purified from frozen-thawed gill tissue.

3-Hydroxyhispidin (Proposed Luciferin)

Actively Disputed

The proposed fungal luciferin per the general pathway model. Can induce bioluminescence in living gill tissue. However, a 2018 inhibitor study (Teranishi, BBRC) found that a competitive inhibitor blocked artificial but not natural bioluminescence in M. chlorophos gills — inconsistent with 3-hydroxyhispidin as the sole natural substrate. The true in vivo luciferin remains unresolved.

Flavin Compounds (Alternative Hypothesis)

Actively Disputed

Teranishi (2016, Chemistry World) identified riboflavin, FMN, and FAD as the only green fluorescent components of M. chlorophos gill extracts, with fluorescence spectra matching the bioluminescence emission spectrum. This alternative hypothesis — that flavins are the actual light emitters — has not been refuted.

Volatile / Odor Compounds

Research Gap

Older literature describes a "strong ammonia odor"; a 2021 Kerala collection reported "mild, not characteristic." No GC-MS or GC-olfactometry study has characterized the responsible volatile compounds. Whether the ammonia odor is a consistent species trait or an artifact of collection conditions is unknown.

An Unresolved Scientific Question — The Real Luciferin in M. chlorophos Gills

The statement found across most popular sources — "fungal bioluminescence uses 3-hydroxyhispidin as its luciferin" — is accurate as a general pathway description but is an oversimplification specifically for Mycena chlorophos. Three competing hypotheses currently have experimental support: trans-3-hydroxyhispidin (the pathway model); flavin compounds including riboflavin, FMN, and FAD (Teranishi 2016); and hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives (trans-4-hydroxycinnamic acid and trans-3,4-dihydroxycinnamic acid).

A 2018 inhibition experiment by Teranishi showed that a competitive inhibitor suppressed artificial bioluminescence induced by adding 3-hydroxyhispidin to living gills — but did not suppress the natural in vivo bioluminescence. If 3-hydroxyhispidin were the natural substrate, the inhibitor should have blocked both. This result suggests the natural substrate in living M. chlorophos gills may differ from the enzyme's in vitro substrate. This is the central unresolved mechanistic question in fungal bioluminescence research, and M. chlorophos is the primary model organism where it remains open.

Is Mycena chlorophos Safe to Eat?

The edibility of Mycena chlorophos is genuinely unknown. No confirmed cases of human toxicity, no characterized toxic compounds, and no systematic toxicological testing exist for this species in the published literature. iNaturalist, Wikipedia, and the peer-reviewed Desjardin redescription all list edibility as unknown rather than confirmed toxic or confirmed safe.

Some vendor pages label this species as "toxic and poisonous." These claims are not supported by any cited peer-reviewed source and should not be treated as established scientific fact. What is accurate is that the species is small (individual fruiting body weight roughly 100mg), has no history of human consumption as food, and has not been evaluated toxicologically. The appropriate default classification is "edibility unknown — not for consumption," which is distinct from "confirmed toxic."

For cultivation and handling purposes: standard mycological precautions apply. Wash hands after handling cultures or fruiting bodies. Do not ingest. No specific dermal irritants have been documented. The bioluminescent compounds themselves (hispidin, 3-hydroxyhispidin) are not known to be toxic at exposure levels possible from handling.

What Makes Mycena chlorophos Remarkable?

Mycena chlorophos holds a curious distinction: it possesses the smallest genome among all sequenced Mycena species — approximately 50.9 megabases haploid, with only 11.7% repeat content. Compare this to M. sanguinolenta at roughly 167 megabases and 39% repeats. This compact genome, with just 13,505 predicted protein-coding genes, produces one of the most intense bioluminescent displays of any land organism, visible from ten meters in darkness. More genes and more genomic complexity do not, in this case, produce more impressive biology.

One of the most unusual aspects of M. chlorophos physiology is the thermal uncoupling of its key biological processes. Mycelium grows fastest at 27°C. Primordia form optimally at 21°C. Luminescence is maximized at 27°C. This creates a paradox: the brightest glow occurs at temperatures that are suboptimal for new primordium development. It may explain the species' precise synchrony with cool rainy periods in Japan — the mushroom glows most brilliantly at exactly the moment its growing conditions are shifting away from optimal.

The luciferase gene cluster of M. chlorophos — comprising the genes luz, h3h, cyp450, and hisps — sits in a low-synteny, genomically unstable chromosomal region prone to transposable element activity and rearrangement. This explains a surprising evolutionary pattern: bioluminescence originated once in the common ancestor of the mycenoid and marasmioid clade approximately 160 million years ago, yet only about 12% of Mycena species have retained it. The cluster is simply prone to being lost. By contrast, in Armillaria, the equivalent cluster sits in a stable chromosomal core — which is why every examined Armillaria species retains bioluminescence. Mycena chlorophos is among the minority that kept what its ancestor evolved.

Literary Footnote — The Oldest Japanese Fiction A credible scientific hypothesis connects Mycena chlorophos (alongside Panellus pusillus) to the opening scene of Taketori Monogatari (The Tale of the Bamboo Cutter, approximately 9th–10th century CE) — the oldest surviving work of Japanese fiction. The narrative opens with a bamboo cutter discovering a luminous bamboo stalk from which a small girl emerges. Both M. chlorophos and P. pusillus grow on bamboo and were present in the Kyoto region during the Heian Period. M. chlorophos is distributed across Hachijo Island and the Bonin Islands and grows on bamboo substrates in India. If the hypothesis is correct, this mushroom's glow inspired the world's first science-fiction story about a being discovered in a glowing object.

The cultural footprint of M. chlorophos in Japan is extensive. Local residents of the Bonin Islands historically attached luminescing fruiting bodies to hair ornaments as living, glowing jewelry — a practice with no real parallel in any other traditional culture's relationship with fungi. The species is listed on a West Samoa 1985 postage stamp, appears in Japanese capsule toy series and picture books, and is the primary driver of night-time ecotourism hikes on Hachijo Island — described in published literature as among the most economically significant tourism activities on the island. It is also widely cited as a likely inspiration for the Pokémon characters Morelull and Shinotic.

Perhaps most importantly for science: Mycena chlorophos is the model organism at the center of the most contested question in fungal bioluminescence research — the identity of the actual in vivo luciferin in the gills. Three competing hypotheses have experimental support. The species with the most studied bioluminescent system is also the species where the fundamental mechanism remains most genuinely unresolved. That is a remarkable position for any organism to occupy.

Frequently Asked Questions About Mycena chlorophos

Can you actually fruit Mycena chlorophos at home?

Yes — Mycena chlorophos can be brought to fruiting body production, which is confirmed in both a peer-reviewed paper (Mori et al. 2011, Luminescence) and a Japanese patent (JP2002065057A). The critical requirement that prior attempts missed is continuous fluorescent light exposure throughout both the spawn run and fruiting phases — light is mechanistically required, not optional. The patent protocol uses a peat-moss-dominant substrate (≥50% peat) at 70% moisture in translucent containers, 26–28°C at 60% RH under light for spawn run, then 22–24°C at 90–100% RH for fruiting. Primordia typically appear around day 8 post-casing; full cycle is approximately 6–7 weeks from inoculation. This is an achievable but demanding cultivation project.

Why does Mycena chlorophos glow, and does the stipe glow too?

The glow is produced by a four-enzyme biochemical pathway that converts caffeic acid from decaying wood into green light (approximately 520–530 nm) via the luciferin-luciferase system — continuous, oxygen-dependent, and without heat output. Critically, luminescence is anatomically specific: the caps and gills emit the brightest light; the stipe has little to no detectable bioluminescence; the mycelium luminesces dimly. This asymmetry is explained by quantitative enzyme data — gill luciferase quantum yield is approximately 18 times higher than stipe luciferase. Claims that "all parts of the mushroom glow equally" are inaccurate.

What is "Green Pepe" — is it the same as Mycena chlorophos?

Yes — Green Pepe is a regional common name for Mycena chlorophos, originating from the Bonin Islands of Japan and used across Pacific Island communities. It is a genuine vernacular name in documented use, not a fabricated or invented common name — though it carries no formal taxonomic sanction and is not universally recognized across the species' pantropical range. The Japanese name yakoh-take (夜光茸, "night-light mushroom") is older and appears in peer-reviewed literature. The scientific name Mycena chlorophos — from Greek for "green light" — is the universal identifier across all scientific and mycological contexts.

What is the best substrate for growing Mycena chlorophos?

The patent-documented protocol specifies peat moss at ≥50% of substrate weight, with the remainder leaf mulch or rice bran, adjusted to 70% moisture. This contrasts with community reports of attempts on grain, straw, or hardwood sawdust — which are more contamination-prone with a slow-colonizing species like this. For terrarium display purposes (glowing colonized wood without fruiting), sterilized hardwood twigs or bamboo sections inoculated from liquid culture are viable and biologically consistent with the species' ecology. All substrate must be fully sterilized, not merely pasteurized. Grain supplementation substantially increases fungus gnat and mold risk according to community growers.

Is Mycena chlorophos toxic or poisonous?

Edibility is unknown — not confirmed toxic, and not confirmed safe. No toxins have been characterized in published literature; no case reports of human poisoning exist; no systematic toxicological testing has been performed. The accurate scientific position is "edibility unknown." Some vendor pages label this species as "toxic and poisonous" without citing any peer-reviewed source — this characterization is not supported by the primary literature. The species is not for consumption, primarily because its edibility has never been evaluated and its small size makes it impractical as food regardless.

Where is Mycena chlorophos found in the wild?

Mycena chlorophos is a pantropical species with documented records across Japan (Bonin and Hachijo Islands, Honshu, Kyushu, Shikoku), India (Kerala, Goa, Maharashtra), Malaysia, Indonesia, Taiwan, Southeast Queensland (Australia), Polynesia, Brazil, and Costa Rica. Fruiting is strongly correlated with rainfall and high humidity; in Japan, mushrooms typically appear the day after rainfall during the two rainy seasons. The species grows on decaying wood, with substrate specificity varying by region — palm petioles in Japan, bamboo in India, hardwood debris in Australia and the Americas.

Also available as a culture plate from Out-Grow.

Mycena chlorophos Culture Plate